On 10/10/2013 12:53 PM, Ian Malone wrote: > On 10 October 2013 15:34, David <dgboles@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 10/10/2013 10:17 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: >>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:13:30 -0400 >>> Jim <binarynut@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> In Fedora repo there is a package named >>>> "yum-plugin-versionlock-1.1.31-10.fc18.noarch" install it. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> He still want to be able to update kernel, >>> What he may be able to do is backup, needed >>> initramfs, vmlinuz, and config to /boot/backup, >>> >>> use that in kernel line as and when required? >>> Havn't tested this theory. >> >> >> These 'kernel files' are created when a kernel installed and they are >> specific for *that* kernel. They do not work with older or newer >> kernels. If *this* kernel is removed they no longer have any value. If >> you re-install that kernel these files are recreated. >> > > Those files *include* the kernel (vmlinuz) and if you wanted you could > manually put them there after removing the package. (You'd also want > the relevant /lib/modules directory too, and probably the relevant > kernel headers) > That said, advice on methods to avoid uninstalling the package in the > first place is probably the best strategy. > You should read my other post in this thread where I linked explanations about the files. And the big question is *why* would anyone want to do that? Sadly the options are: New kernels no longer work with your older, or odd, hardware then don't update the kernel. Which also leaves you with not being about to update to new OS version(s). Or? Replace the the older, or odd, hardware. Life goes on. -- David -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
