Yeap, that is what I am seeing, thanks that should give me an easier way to check. And I did mkfs a new xfs partition (the old one build 3-4 years ago did not have the issue), and I have perviously verified that new one does have much larger inodes. I guess either I need to start logging things against each wrong package, or give up and just reinstall the machine 64-bit... On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 21:21:19 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > >> I have recently created a new 6tb XFS filesystem. >> >> After this gnucash, pan and a number of other utilities (on one of the >> 32-bit machines) start failing to work and complaining about value too >> large for defined data type. > > Sounds familiar to the following thread on devel list > (64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries). There's also script to > check the executables: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-February/178821.html > -- > users mailing list > users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
