Am 26.08.2013 16:39, schrieb g: > On 08/25/2013 12:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 25.08.2013 19:20, schrieb Tom Horsley: >>> Given that, I've had to develop my own theory: >>> >>> The mei module is actually the primary back door >>> for the NSA to access linux systems. Why else would >>> they go to so much trouble to generate so much obfuscated >>> non-documentation for it? >> >> *stop* spread such unqualified FUD in the public and RTFM > > you call wikipedia "the manual"? did i that? i referred to wikipedia because *every* article there has references so if you are so gently and scroll down or click on the anchors on top you find a ton of links referring to Intel websites and PDF's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Active_Management_Technology#External_links http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Active_Management_Technology#References > as for 'fud', have a look at; > http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fud i know what FUD is and if you look at the posts of Tom Horsley this is *clearly* FUD because he pretends that anything he does not understand is related to the NSA without *any* proof
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
