Re: HD to SSD question.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:02:42PM +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:

> On 20.08.2013, Heinz Diehl wrote: 
> 
> > Then, open another one and run fsync-tester. The numbers that count to
> > compare different elevators on your system is the output fsync-tester
> > generates while your machine is generating the "bigfile".
> 
> And while your're at it, you could also consider doing some
> fsmark runs (without the load), e.g.:
> 
>  ./fs_mark -S 1 -D 10000 -N 100000 -d /home/htd/fsmark/test -s 65536 -t4 -w 4096 -F 
> 
> Notice the -t switch, which lets you specify the number of
> threads used.

Here they are:

CFQ:

    #  ./fs_mark  -S  1  -D  10000  -N  100000  -d  /home/mihai/tmp/c/fs_mark-3.3  -s  65536  -t4  -w  4096  -F 
    # Version 3.3, 4 thread(s) starting at Tue Aug 20 23:30:40 2013
    # Sync method: INBAND FSYNC: fsync() per file in write loop.
    # Directories: Round Robin between directories across 10000
    # subdirectories with 100000 files per subdirectory.
    # File names: 40 bytes long, (16 initial bytes of time stamp
    # with 24 random bytes at end of name)
    # Files info: size 65536 bytes, written with an IO size of
    # 4096 bytes per write
    # App overhead is time in microseconds spent in the test not
    # doing file writing related system calls.
    #
    FSUse%        Count         Size    Files/sec     App Overhead
        77         4000        65536         50.4            88160
        77         8000        65536         43.2           104150
        77        12000        65536         44.4            94512

Deadline:

    #  ./fs_mark  -S  1  -D  10000  -N  100000  -d  /home/mihai/tmp/c/fs_mark-3.3/test  -s  65536  -t4  -w  4096  -F 
    # Version 3.3, 4 thread(s) starting at Tue Aug 20 23:42:19 2013
    # Sync method: INBAND FSYNC: fsync() per file in write loop.
    # Directories: Round Robin between directories across 10000
    # subdirectories with 100000 files per subdirectory.
    # File names: 40 bytes long, (16 initial bytes of time stamp
    # with 24 random bytes at end of name)
    # Files info: size 65536 bytes, written with an IO size of
    # 4096 bytes per write
    # App overhead is time in microseconds spent in the test not
    # doing file writing related system calls.
    #
    FSUse%        Count         Size    Files/sec     App Overhead
        77         4000        65536         47.6            92902
        77         8000        65536         41.6           101888
        77        12000        65536         39.6            97937

Noop:

    #  ./fs_mark  -S  1  -D  10000  -N  100000  -d  /home/mihai/tmp/c/fs_mark-3.3/test  -s  65536  -t4  -w  4096  -F 
    # Version 3.3, 4 thread(s) starting at Tue Aug 20 23:48:10 2013
    # Sync method: INBAND FSYNC: fsync() per file in write loop.
    # Directories: Round Robin between directories across 10000
    # subdirectories with 100000 files per subdirectory.
    # File names: 40 bytes long, (16 initial bytes of time stamp
    # with 24 random bytes at end of name)
    # Files info: size 65536 bytes, written with an IO size of
    # 4096 bytes per write
    # App overhead is time in microseconds spent in the test not
    # doing file writing related system calls.
    #
    FSUse%        Count         Size    Files/sec     App Overhead
        77         4000        65536         46.8            89478
        77         8000        65536         42.0           101337
        77        12000        65536         43.2            95834

It does not look like significant differences between schedulers.

Mihai
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux