Am 12.08.2013 16:45, schrieb Ed Greshko: > On 08/12/13 22:37, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 08/12/2013 03:17 PM, Georgios Petasis wrote: >>> Is there a reason my java 1.7 is not updated to java 1.8 with "yum -y >>> update"? >> java 1.8 doesn't exist. We've not even finished the spec yet. There >> is a preview that people can play with, but it's certainly not an >> update. >> >> Andrew. >> > > Just curious then..... > > [root@localhost ~]# yum list available | grep java-1.8.0 > java-1.8.0-openjdk.i686 1:1.8.0.0-0.9.b89.fc19 updates > java-1.8.0-openjdk.x86_64 1:1.8.0.0-0.9.b89.fc19 updates > java-1.8.0-openjdk-demo.x86_64 1:1.8.0.0-0.9.b89.fc19 updates > java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel.i686 1:1.8.0.0-0.9.b89.fc19 updates > java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel.x86_64 1:1.8.0.0-0.9.b89.fc19 updates > java-1.8.0-openjdk-javadoc.noarch 1:1.8.0.0-0.9.b89.fc19 updates > java-1.8.0-openjdk-src.x86_64 1:1.8.0.0-0.9.b89.fc19 updates > > If it is a "preview" wouldn't it make a bit more sense to have it in updates-testing? why? this is not the job of "updates-testing" "java-1.8.0-openjdk" is not the same package as "java-1.7.0-openjdk" "1.8.0.0-0.9.b89.fc19" is the version part you can have installed *both*
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
