Re: Slow initialization of something during boot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/13/2013 05:28 PM, poma wrote:
Dana 13.08.2013 20:00, Frank je napisao:
On 08/13/2013 01:24 PM, poma wrote:
On 13.08.2013 18:49, Frank wrote:
Since I made the switch to a 64 bit machine (still using 32 bit Fedora
19) there is a long delay just before lightdm comes up with the login
screen.

[frank@localhost ~]$ sudo systemd-analyze blame
           19.698s NetworkManager.service
           19.597s accounts-daemon.service
           18.723s chronyd.service
           18.567s lightdm.service
…

             638ms NetworkManager.service
             135ms avahi-daemon.service
             127ms lightdm.service


I installed
- lightdm-1.6.0-10.fc19.x86_64
- lightdm-gtk-1.5.1-3.fc19.x86_64
- icewm-1.3.7-9.fc19.x86_64
- ConsoleKit-0.4.5-5.fc19.x86_64
- ConsoleKit-x11-0.4.5-5.fc19.x86_64
- ConsoleKit-libs-0.4.5-5.fc19.x86_64

- rm /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit.service
- rm /var/lib/AccountsService/users/$USER
   to produce the following warnings within /var/log/lightdm/x-0-greeter.log:
** (process:3229): WARNING **: Failed to open CK session:
GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name
org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit was not provided by any .service files
** (lightdm-gtk-greeter:3231): WARNING **: Failed to load user image:
Failed to open file '/home/$USER/.face': Permission denied
…
   which are more or less the same as in your readings.

However didn't manage to produce a lag you mentioned and startup is even
faster,
             99ms lightdm.service

What can I say. :)
Take into account that you are using 32-bits which can be problematic in
some cases comparing with a lot more tested 64-bits.
This doesn't have to be exactly the case, but.

So....32-bit software on a 64-bit CPU sometimes may not be all it's cracked up to be :) Boy, Poma, if you can't figure it out....I doubt anyone here can - I've been following your various and sundry suggestions to users closely and you are usually close to, if not on the mark.

Is this worth submitting a bug ??



I recommend that you begin to sing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAzqSYQ9X9U :)


  Practicing now.....listen............


poma


--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org



[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux