On 8/8/2013 6:09 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:18 PM, David <dgboles@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Thank you for that. So tell me wwy the Xulrunner dependency for Firefox >> came out right away, it alwyas does, and Firefox was delayed? As it >> always is. > > It looks like the maintainer made a mistake and accidentally bumped > the version in the RPM wrong, so Firefox 23 did get released at the > same time, but rpm thought it was Firefox 22. I imagine the Firefox > maintainers a few scripts so they can get updates out really fast, but > this time they (or it) tripped up and pass a wrong argument to them or > something. Us package maintainers are human too. ;-) > > A tester caught it four whole hours after the update was submitted, > and three hours after that it was fixed (most of which was probably > spent waiting for it to build ;-). This didn't even delay it from > making the day's updates-testing push. Which is proof that 'stuff happens'. :-) I see. And thank you for that. I certainly did not mean to create a problem with a simple question. Thanks again. -- David -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org