Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Am 29.07.2013 18:08, schrieb lee:
>> Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Am 28.07.2013 23:35, schrieb lee:
>>>> Marko Vojinovic <vvmarko@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>> Nevertheless, I have seen various proposals for RPM to include the
>>>>> concept of soft dependencies. But AFAIK, it hasn't happened so far.
>>>>
>>>> RPM doesn't support suggested packages? Are you serious?
>>>
>>> *no*
>>
>> So does it or not?
>
> it does *not*
That sucks.
>>> if whatever is *linked* against whatever library
>>> the library need to be installed and loaded at
>>> startup, if it is not installed the binary crashs
>>
>> It doesn't crash, it only doesn't run
>
> *wrong*
>
> if something is linked against the avahi libraries
> and they are not installed it will *crash*
It won't run to begin with but say it cannot find this or that library,
and something that doesn't run can't crash.
--
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "No error here")
signal(error ("No error here"))
error("No %s here" "error")
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
