> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Patrick Lists
> Sent: 07/29/13 07:07 PM
> To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: rpmbuild
>
> On 07/29/2013 05:26 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Thank for your help.
> >
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Patrick Dupre <pdupre@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> RPM build errors:
> >>> File not found by glob:
> >>> /home/pdupre/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1.fc18.x86_64/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/*
> >>>
> >>
> >> It's saying there's no files there... just cd into there and look around.
> >> Perhaps the files are not being installed correctly. Another option is to
> >> just comment out "%{perl_vendorlib}/*" and see if rpmbuild complains about
> >> unpackaged files.
> >>
> > Of course, there is not /home/pdupre/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1.fc18.x86_64/usr/share/perl5
> > But where are the files?
> >
> > Commenting %{perl_vendorlib}/*
> > gives:
> >
> > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> > Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /home/pdupre/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-PDL-LAPACK-0.12-1.fc18.x86_64
> > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> > /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/08/33a58fc0ee04cfa29b0aa6f9c0aaa31f2c6a93
> > /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/08/33a58fc0ee04cfa29b0aa6f9c0aaa31f2c6a93.debug
> > /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/PDL/LAPACK/LAPACK.so.debug
> > /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/LAPACK.pm
> > /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/PDL/LAPACK/LAPACK.bs
> > /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/PDL/LAPACK/LAPACK.so
> > /usr/src/debug/PDL-LAPACK-0.12/LAPACK.c
> > /usr/src/debug/PDL-LAPACK-0.12/LAPACK.xs
> >
> >
> > RPM build errors:
> > Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> > /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/08/33a58fc0ee04cfa29b0aa6f9c0aaa31f2c6a93
> > /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/08/33a58fc0ee04cfa29b0aa6f9c0aaa31f2c6a93.debug
> > /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/PDL/LAPACK/LAPACK.so.debug
> > /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/LAPACK.pm
> > /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/PDL/LAPACK/LAPACK.bs
> > /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/PDL/LAPACK/LAPACK.so
> > /usr/src/debug/PDL-LAPACK-0.12/LAPACK.c
> > /usr/src/debug/PDL-LAPACK-0.12/LAPACK.xs
>
> It seems that package is dependent on the x86_64 arch in which case it
> will get installed in perl_vendorarch. So try to use %{perl_vendorarch}
> in the %files section:
>
> %files
> %defattr(-,root,root,-)
> %doc Changes lapack.pd README
> %{perl_vendorarch}/*
> %{_mandir}/man3/*
>
cpanspec decided that it is noarch.
moving to %{perl_vendorarch}/*
gives:
error: Arch dependent binaries in noarch package
RPM build errors:
Arch dependent binaries in noarch package
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre@xxxxxxx
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
