Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 28/07/13 17:49, lee wrote: >> There is something wrong with these requirements. I don't need avahi, >> for example, and it's impossible to remove without taking down the whole >> system. > > Like Sam said in the other reply; A dependency is not "broken" if the > package actually needs it. If you think a given package is not needed, > gather the reasons for who you think so and file a bug report. Many, if not all of the packages depending on the avahi package do not need the avahi-daemon. So what's the problem here? + dependencies broken because packages not needing a package depend on it + bad packaging + the package management not supporting suggestions + the installer not giving users choices about what to install + something else + all of the above? -- Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
