Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:08:19AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:01:43PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
This is back, <sigh> again. Having found out that fedup fails
totally to work on drives with encrypted partitions,
I don't think this is still the case: I did F18->F19 on my laptop
(encrypted /home and swap) using fedup and it worked just fine.
Not sure what you mean by "still the case,"
I mean still an issue with fedup being unable to upgrade a system with
encrypted filesystems. That's why I ended the piece being quoted with
"fedup fails totally to workon drives with encrypted partitions,".
it was as of 1PM
yesterday when I posted, and since it's burned on DVD I doubt it's
changes. Some systems refuse to install without network.
I'm not sure we're talking the same thing then.
I may have misread, we have a lot of depth to quotes here. There seem to be two
issues, fedup on LUKS, and clean install looping asking for network. I may only
see the network issue after fedup has been run, and I did find that if I write
100MB of /dev/zero to the partitions I'm going to use (from rescue CD) no issues
on clean install. There MAY be an issue with reading the partitions and saving
data, don't care as long as it can be done.
I'm trying a yum upgrade in LUKS next week, I am taking a few days off from
anything challenging to deal with real life. May wait and test more when the
18->19 cycle comes.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
