On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Mark LaPierre <marklapier@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> It may be an artifact of people who have trouble being more likely to >> write to the list, but it seems that people who have Fedup problems seem to >> outnumber those who have success outright with no problems first try. >> That's probably not the case though. >> >> The issues are probably caused by people who add stuff from foreign repos. >> How else would you end up with an F18 kernel that was newer than the F19 >> kernel that you were trying to replace it with? That doesn't happen to all >> F18 users does it? My money is on NO. > > > No custom kernels... for some reason F18 ended up with 3.9.10 and F19 is > still on 3.9.9 (or something like that). > > I do have some custom packages, but nothing that would prevent basic > functionality, mostly end user apps, and they're all in a local repository > which I rebuild F19 packages in most cases. > > fedup only updated about 500 packages. When I got my system fixed enough to > run yum update, it still needed about 1100. > > My guess at this point is that fedup assumed that because my local > repository was "local" (over nfs) that it didn't need to add these packages > to /var/lib/fedora-upgrade. If this is indeed the case that is a VERY bad > assumption. It's nuts to not include ALL the packages needed for the upgrade > transaction. And even if there's a good reason not to (I can't think of one) > then if you're missing 1100 packages, it should refuse to do the upgrade. > > Richard > > -- In reading this my hopefully helpful hint / question would be: did you enter the fedup command correctly? Richard -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
