Neal Becker wrote: > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_311_filesystems&num=1 > > I installed using btrfs on my SSD. Maybe I should be feeling some buyer's > remorse? While being fast is nice, after reading, http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs It seems clear to me btrfs primary focus is not pure performance, but advanced features. Some choice quotes: "... focusing on fault tolerance, repair and easy administration." "... intended to address the lack of pooling, snapshots, checksums and integral multi-device spanning" "it offers improvements in scalability, reliability, and ease of management" In short, if you expected btrfs to be significantly faster (than ext4, for example) for general use, you probably ought to adjust your expectations. -- rex -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
