On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 00:20 +0100, Ian Malone wrote: > On 18 July 2013 00:03, Frantisek Hanzlik <franta@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > poma wrote: > >> On 17.07.2013 23:41, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: > >> > >>> … Or, maybe > >>> there is/are other programs, better/more suitable for this? > >> > >> http://www.digikam.org/ > >> > >> poma > > > > You recommend skip over F19+ and jump directly to windows? IMO it is > > unacceptable, they are horrible reactionaries and do not merits > > such happiness. > > Or, when You recommend 'digikam' SW, what are benefits for this > > election? > > Digikam is Qt/KDE based, thus I'd rather see some GTK based piece of > > SW (but not insist upon this - I'm using Xfce and MATE and using k3b > > instead of not so powerfull GTK alternatives). > > Could You offer/refer to some comparison digikam x gThumb x shotwell? > > > > Digikam has been in Fedora since F17, Windows support is new and they > have it as an announcement on their homepage. I've used Digikam as part of KDE for a lot longer than that. I didn't even know there was a Windows version. poc -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
