Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.07.2013 20:10, schrieb Robert Holtzman:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:55:15PM -0300, Fernando Lozano wrote:
Hi Reindl,
first: my intention is *not* to start another epic thread
since i am always the unholy prick here after i lose patience
maybe others should also reconsider *not* hijacking threads by
Thanks for clarification. Changing the subject (and keeping the original
one with a [Re:]) is standard procedures in many mailing lists, I didn't
know it was not accepted here. My apologies.
"Re:" means the message is a reply to a previous post. If the subject
line on the same thread is changed then [was......] is appended.
What lists are you referring to?
the real problem is thread-view
you have to open a growing tree-structure and look if there
is something related to the topic you are interested in
if it is a new thread you can have it in the archive but closed
and only open the ones you are currently interested in
and the next problem that over time it becomes unclear to what
people responded - the original thread or subthreads, that feels
like if you have a tech meeting with 10 people and then one
marketing guy steps in the room and fire his statements
Well my reader has "delete subthread" so I can at least take a whack at it.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
