Am 15.07.2013 20:55, schrieb lee: > James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Vendors (including pure open source solutions backed by a vendor) will >> support a long term distribution but not something like fedora where the >> increase of cost for them to support it due to potentially massive changes >> every 6 months is significant. > > So you are saying that, for some good reasons, you can generally assume > right away that in business applications the risks involved with changes > greatly outweigh the potential advantage of having new features and that > you need something that doesn't change for at least three to five years? > > Does that make it worthwhile to use software that cannot be upgraded > when it reaches its end of life (either because support ceases or > because new features are needed)? after *TEN YEARS*? surely! not for me, maybe not for you but surely!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
