On 07/11/2013 07:14 PM, Fernando Lozano wrote:
Hi Jiri,
Luckily (or not? - because it passed update test) this do not happen always. And unluckily this was bugged after the f19 freeze - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979128
I think I will abandon whole update alternatives process and come with direct remove/add as this is not firs time when alternatives behaved .. as they do. But until now it was always catch in time.
Please don't drop alternatives from OpenJDK. ;-)
Dont worry. No pure removal:)
But why is the bug marked as "CLOSED WORKSFORME"?
Well I guess the manual setup of alternatives was enough for Gil.
But I agree with your tracking bug (Thank you). I will fix soon.
I think it's a real problem if a user installs/upgrade and can't run "java" out of the box.
Created bug #983677. Hope this time someone will fix the packages instead of closing without resolution.
J.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
