Michael Hennebry <hennebry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, lee wrote: > In my case, I found Fedora very expensive to upgrade. That I can understand --- upgrading twice a year, especially when it's questionable if the upgrade works --- can be painful, all the more when you have many machines to upgrade. It gave me a lot to worry about even with only one. > If I want something that *I* cannot install on CentOS, > I'll just have to find a distribution earlier in its release cycle. > That might be the time to consider virtualization. True, it can help you out when requirements change and makes upgradeability less important. >> Unless I missed it, nobody has described a particular use case yet in >> which it is obvious that it is good to use CentOS. Upgrading holds its >> risks as well as using software that cannot be upgraded. The future >> cannot be predicted. So how do you make a decision like between using >> Fedora and CentOS? > > Is there a particular use case in which it > is obvious that it is good to use RHEL? At least I can imagine some, assuming that their commercial support is worthwhile to have. I wouldn't expect needing lots of new features on a mail- or web-server. -- Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
