On 7/15/2013 4:42 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, lee wrote: > >> Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> mhh thats why so many companies still using WinXP i guess >> >> Maybe there are other reasons for that, like that is isn't upgradable >> and/or that it is expensive to switch. It's also possible that other >> software they are using works best with that, maybe because the other >> software hasn't been upgraded yet. > > In my case, I found Fedora very expensive to upgrade. > Even before complete failure, installs were a pain. > I spent days or weeks wanting to kill something. > Installing CentOS went perfectly. > I did net install, something I'd never done before, > because my DVD drive wasn't working at the time. > > If I want something that *I* cannot install on CentOS, > I'll just have to find a distribution earlier in its release cycle. > That might be the time to consider virtualization. > >> Unless I missed it, nobody has described a particular use case yet in >> which it is obvious that it is good to use CentOS. Upgrading holds its >> risks as well as using software that cannot be upgraded. The future >> cannot be predicted. So how do you make a decision like between using >> Fedora and CentOS? > > Is there a particular use case in which it > is obvious that it is good to use RHEL? > You are aware the Red Hat and CentOS are made from Fedora? -- David -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
