On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:36:10PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 07/11/2013 12:12 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > >I've seen people with double-NAT issues before, where "special" > >protocols like FTP or game console can't traverse the double-NAT. > > I'm not quite sure what you mean here. Are you referring to having > one router "behind" another, with both using NAT? I have a DSL > modem that's supposed to act as a router, with two devices connected > to it: a regular router and a WiFi router, both on separate subnets, > both using NAT, and I've never had any problems with such things as > FTP. Of course, my equipment probably doesn't have what you refer > to as older implementations, so I may just be lucky. > > In any event, thanx for the information. Some ISPs deploy something known as CGN (Carrier-Grade NAT) due the the IPv4 shortage, in which case if your "gateway" device at home is also doing NAT, you have double NAT. -- staticsafe O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org Please don't top post. Please don't CC! I'm subscribed to whatever list I just posted on. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
