On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 02:14:20PM -0300, Fernando Lozano wrote: > >I think I will abandon whole update alternatives process and come > >with direct remove/add as this is not firs time when alternatives > >behaved .. as they do. But until now it was always catch in time. > Please don't drop alternatives from OpenJDK. ;-) It's a really messy way to get the wanted result (swapable java stacks). I think we can do better. I'm not saying we should drop it before we have a better approach, but I think that should be the aim. I always find $ rpm -qf `which java` file /usr/bin/java is not owned by any package to be very frustrating. > I think it's a real problem if a user installs/upgrade and can't run > "java" out of the box. Absolutely. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
