On 07/04/13 06:33, Tom Horsley wrote: > When I was running f19 beta, I mostly ignored this, but I've > done a distro-sync now and the update I just did once again > got a slew of deltas do not match errors: Well, first of all, you're coming from a "beta" environment and you were "warned" about potential problems and you accepted you fate. :-) :-) > > Finishing delta rebuilds of 118 package(s) (222 M) > delta does not match installed data==- ] 2.9 MB/s | 96 MB 00:43 ETA > delta does not match installed data==- ] 3.0 MB/s | 103 MB 00:39 ETA > delta does not match installed data=== ] 3.2 MB/s | 105 MB 00:36 ETA > delta does not match installed data > delta does not match installed data==== ] 2.4 MB/s | 120 MB 00:42 ETA > delta does not match installed data > corrupt delta: bad sequence3% [=========- ] 3.3 MB/s | 142 MB 00:23 ETA > delta does not match installed data======- ] 3.6 MB/s | 158 MB 00:17 ETA > Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying..| 222 MB 00:00 ETA > (1/14): dbus-libs-1.6.12-1.fc19.i686.rpm | 149 kB 00:00 > (2/14): cups-libs-1.6.2-12.fc19.i686.rpm | 346 kB 00:00 > (3/14): graphite2-1.2.2-2.fc19.i686.rpm | 82 kB 00:00 > (4/14): glibc-2.17-11.fc19.i686.rpm | 4.2 MB 00:01 > (5/14): gtk2-2.24.19-3.fc19.i686.rpm | 3.3 MB 00:01 > (6/14): libcurl-7.29.0-7.fc19.i686.rpm | 214 kB 00:00 > (7/14): nspr-4.10-2.fc19.i686.rpm | 122 kB 00:00 > (8/14): nss-3.15-5.fc19.i686.rpm | 838 kB 00:00 > (9/14): nss-softokn-3.15-3.fc19.i686.rpm | 296 kB 00:00 > (10/14): nss-softokn-freebl-3.15-3.fc19.i686.rpm | 145 kB 00:00 > (11/14): nss-util-3.15-1.fc19.i686.rpm | 66 kB 00:00 > (12/14): openldap-2.4.35-5.fc19.i686.rpm | 330 kB 00:00 > (13/14): systemd-libs-204-9.fc19.i686.rpm | 152 kB 00:00 > (14/14): krb5-libs-1.11.3-2.fc19.i686.rpm | 787 kB 00:06 > > I can assure you, I am not manually modifying anything installed by > those packages to cause this mismatch. I do notice they are all > 32 bit packages, but I'm running 64 bit. Is yum trying to apply > a 64 bit delta to a 32 bit package or something? Well, to answer the first question. Are the 32-bit packages installed? I know on my "work" system there are plenty of i686 packages installed to support some 32-bit apps, such as skype, that I've installed. If they are installed, and you don't know why or if you need them....you can always un-install. If you don't want to un-install them you can always "yum reinstall" them. > > In addition, after the install it apparently didn't cleanup those 14 > packages: > > [root@zooty ~]# yum clean packages > Loaded plugins: afteryum, fastestmirror, langpacks, refresh-packagekit > Cleaning repos: fedora google-chrome rpmfusion-free rpmfusion-free-updates > : rpmfusion-nonfree rpmfusion-nonfree-updates updates > 14 package files removed > > Should I file a bugzilla against yum (or something else)? I think I would concentrate more on resolving the issue than filing a bugzilla in this instance. I think it would be rather difficult to determine the circumstances leading up to the current situation. -- The only thing worse than a poorly asked question is a cryptic answer. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
