Re: fedup f18->f19 going OK?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/03/13 07:34, Steven Stern wrote:
> On 07/02/2013 06:23 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 07/03/13 06:13, Steven Stern wrote:
>>> On 07/02/2013 04:27 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>>> On 07/03/13 04:32, Steven Stern wrote:
>>>>> On 07/02/2013 03:23 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 08:02 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>>>>>>> I'm about to try fedup f18->f19.  Any reports good/bad on this route?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just finished the upgrade.  Some of my XFCE settings aren't quite right,
>>>>>> but the changes aren't anything I can't live with... or care about
>>>>>> enough to change right away.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There doesn't seem to be an F19 Virtualbox repo yet, but the F18 version
>>>>>> is running OK.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Getting AVCs every time I start Chrome -- reported as a bug.
>>>> Hope you reported the bug to Google as it is a Chrome bug and and a Fedora problem.  This was discussed on the test list a while back.  A version of Chrome unstable had the fix....but it really was unstable.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I reported it wherever the AVC bug reports go....
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964651
>>>
>>> As it worked in F18 and not in F19, it seems to me it's a bug in the
>>> F19-supplied SELinux policy.
>>>
>> FWIW, I see in the report ....
>>
>> Source RPM Packages           google-chrome-stable-26.0.1410.63-192696.x86_64
>>
>> On my F19 test system, fedup'd from F18 I have....
>>
>> google-chrome-stable-28.0.1500.70-209565.x86_64
>> selinux-policy-3.12.1-54.fc19.noarch
>> selinux-policy-targeted-3.12.1-54.fc19.noarch
>>
>> And I am not seeing the AVC you're seeing.  Have you considered updating your Chrome?
>>
> My chrome package is google-chrome-beta-28.0.1500.70-209565.x86_64,
> straight from the Google repo.  I switched from stable to beta to get
> rid of the last AVC problem.
>

So, you're saying that the beta of Chrome does not cause the AVC?

FWIW, my google-chrome-stable-28.0.1500.70-209565.x86_64 came directly from the Google repo as well.  But, I had to "yum clean metadata" before it was picked up.


-- 
The only thing worse than a poorly asked question is a cryptic answer.
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux