Re: OT: Hard drive warning at boot time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Rick Stevens <ricks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> To me, it is a bit surprising how the failure of the hard disk can be
>>>> predicted (and with a time projection)!
>>>
>>>
>>> One of the lines you listed was the "reallocated sector count".
>>> Basically, when you buy a 500G drive, it really has more space than
>>> that.  Some of the sectors are reserved and not reported to the system.
>>> When the drive detects a bad sector, it relocates it to one of the
>>> reserved sectors.  Once it has relocated a certain number, it reports
>>> the drive as failing (possibly because it is out of reserved sectors to
>>> use).
>>>
>>>> I have already done a full backup. Should I wait for some days to
>>>> check out whether the alarm is true or not?
>>>
>>>
>>> Given there were a bunch of reallocated sectors, I'd replace it as soon
>>> as possible and then destroy it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Chris, for your very useful clarification -- I now understand
>> better the things at issue.
>
>
> The warnings from smartctl aren't guarantees the drive is dying, but
> that there's a high probability that it will at some point in the very
> near future. If you get an alert, the standard recommendation is to
> back up your data and get a new drive ASAP.
>
> Think of the warning as the "check engine" light on a car. If it goes
> on, it could mean something as innocuous as you're out of windscreen
> washer fluid to "your gearbox fell out on the tarmac two miles back."
> Either way, you need to look at the output from the ODB2 scanner to see
> what's really wrong. The Linux equivalent of the OBD2 scanner is the
> "smartctl -a -H /dev/sdX" command.
>
> Based on that info, you can decide if you must replace the drive
> immediately or if you can wait a bit. Given the relatively low cost of
> new drives, I'd replace it sooner rather than later. In fact, when I
> see a "deal" on drives, I'll buy a couple so I can have spares for just
> this sort of situation. I believe in a belt and suspenders as far as my
> data is concerned.


Thanks, Rick. I am going to follow your advice.

Paul
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux