Am 11.05.2013 21:03, schrieb Fernando Cassia: > On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:03 PM, "Germán A. Racca" > <german.racca@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I sincerely think that this kind of complaints (I have seen several from you >> too) won't take you nowhere. > > Yes, it takes me to nirvana. It shows me what software is well written > and which ones are not *no it does not* i am a really hard figther against *useless* dependencies or not fine enough splittet ones by subpackages pulling a X11 dependency-chain on servers *but* i prove you that liveusb-creator pulls less than 7 MB deps on my KDE-system and writea applicaton with QT *is not* create a "non well written application" how many packages have you installed - i bet a lot more than i have as well as only few people manage setups with 6.2 GB for the rootfs inclduding eclipse and VMware as well as server-sw and a desktop so how can a application pull only 7 MB deps be badly written only because it pulls on *your special setup* more? [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -qa | wc -l 1445 /dev/md1 ext4 29G 6,2G 23G 22% /
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
