Thx all.
After being being pointed to systemd-sysctrl.service, I was able to find this bug which was opened/closed/re-discussed/unresolved but the bug was left "closed" which likely means it got lost
Http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850427
I'll re-open in my distro's bugzilla.
The curious thing is that this recent bug clearly says the IPv4 branch I asked about earlier should exist, but I don't see it on my openSUSE system (but this should be identical to Fedora). If the branch really is gone and replaced, this is an important change systemd has made which lacks documentation.
Maybe systemd(like SysVinit) ordinarily doesn't read the /proc/ tree again after booting, but the User has always been able to modify and manually invoke sysctl -p to update the system on the fly.
Tony
On 08.05.2013 18:44, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
…
> systemd's involvement with /proc begins and ends with mounting it.
> The kernel defines its contents and they will be the same regardless
> of which init system you use.
…
cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-sysctl.service :)
poma
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
