On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 15:40 +1100, Celik wrote:Only you can answer that. Ask yourself what you can afford to lose.
> In this thread, it has been suggested to do daily backups. But it
> wasn't
> clear, should the daily backups be for the whole system or only the
> current
> project we are working on?
Hardly surprising if you're doing it with tar, which is making a
> An issue that has been bothering me and caused me to be reluctant in
> making
> regular backups is - a complete backup is costly. It takes 4-5 hours
> minimum, plus causing storage issues, the compressed home directory is
> too
> large.
complete copy every time. That's the wrong approach. As I mentioned
earlier, rsnapshot, obnam and others can do incremental backups which
take up little space. They are also better run as cron jobs, i.e.
automatically. I run mine when my system is quiescent (4am every day)
but again that's your call.
And it goes without saying that the backup should be to another machine,
e.g. using rsync or a net-mounted filesystem.
Note that these are recommendations for a personal system that you can't
afford to lose. For larger systems you might want to look at solutions
such as Amanda or Bacula (not that these won't work on a personal system
as well, they just need a bit more setting up).
Thank you
poc
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
