Am 02.04.2013 22:43, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz: > On 02.04.2013 20:57, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 02.04.2013 20:52, schrieb Tom Horsley: >>> On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:39:06 -0400 >>> Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: >>> >>>> What I need is an example of a simple directory tree with the proper >>>> sizes. >>> What is wrong with one partition named / on whole disk? Everything >>> has room to grow then :-) >> it is idiotic in the case of a damaged OS >> you have to backup your data before re-isntall >> >> it is idiotic in case of /boot not seperated for >> hwatever FS-changes, not so long ago ext4 was new >> and it was no problem to convert the rootfs and >> data parttions to ext4 but /boot needed to stay at ext3 >> >> at least you should seperate /boot, sysroot and your data >> not only on Linux, on Windows it was also idiotic do save >> your data at c:\ and blindl use this often chossed pre-setup >> of most vendors > > It really depends on your use case. It might be idiotic to recommend > something to all people without knowing their use case. I agree that for > some deployments separate root and data partition is must have but not > for all. I have a lot of qemu/kvm images that for simplicity only have > two partitions (root and swap) or sometimes root only if this are only play-around-systems with no data - fine from the moment on you have data on your machine it is idiotic in ANY usecase to not seperate them from the OS
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
