On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 06:21:09PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 28.03.2013 16:56, schrieb Bill Oliver: > > > Sometimes its good to try to be helpful even if the person can't take advantage of the kneejerk obvious response. > > There can be lots of reasons that a person can't upgrade an OS. > > > > For instance, I am closely affiliated with a very large multi-hospital group that is still running Windows XP. > > Why? The reason is that the healthcare software (case management, automated medical records, etc.) has to be > > approved by the Food and Drug Administration before it can be substantially changed > > and what has this do with Fedora? Bill is trying to explain why the OP might not be in a position to simply reinstall or upgrade. > if you install fedora the life-cycle is known It may not have been at the time the person installed. Assume good intentions, please. If you are not willing to help further, it's OK to simply move on to another thread. :-) -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
