Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Sounds like NO, there has been progress in documentation since 2.5 days, but
sounds like it all has to be created by hand in terms of scripts, spec
files, etc. Thanks, but if it hasn't gotten less time consuming in 12-15
years, let it be someone else's time.
Have you looked at the Packager's Guide in the Fedora Docs? It's
still in draft status, but seems to be a very nice modern refresh of
the RPM documentation.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Packagers_Guide/index.html
Thank you, I confess that I generally assume Draft Documentation is more
intended to be read by those who know the topic and can catch technical errors.
I will take a look, since the nice tool which made the process easy seems not
readily available. For one group, I confess I probably would do as well to build
static binaries independent of their shortcomings.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
