On Sun, 10 Mar 2013, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 03/10/2013 06:27 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
However, the frustration comes more into play, seeing that in F18
PostGIS 1.5 is distributed along with PostgreSQL 9.2. If you look at the
PostGIS Wiki, it says that two will not work together.
Complaining about it here will not get it fixed.
I also posted on postgis-users.
In the future you need to file bugs at https://bugzilla.redhat.com against
the correct component. This will get the attention of the package maintainer.
They may not know that PostGIS needs to be updated.
It looks like they do know, though, and an update was queued but it failed to
pass QA.
They did know; so there's no point in saying that no one knew.
PostGIS has an active user base; they have clearly stated dependencies.
Releasing F18 with a mismatched release of PostGIS and PostgreSQL should
not have been done.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-1551
Feel free to open a bug as no action has been taken in a month.
If you follow the discussions on postgis-users, there are pending issues
elsewhere in fedoraproject, that have held up (don't know why) software
more fundamental to the stack.
That's one of the problems.
The other is diffusion and specialization. What is the correct forum in
which to raise issues.
Back in usenet days with character-based readers and clear threading, it
was easy to participate and find discussions relating. These days it is
more email lists.
So if not users@... , then where?
MP
pyz@xxxxxxxxx
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
