On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 10:03:24 +0100, poma wrote:
> On 02/23/13 04:45, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:00 PM, poma wrote:
> >> deco grub2-2.00-16.fc19.src.rpm
> >> 13020 blocks
> > [backtrace cut]
> >> Aborted
> >> --
> >
> > Hmm, the crash does not happen here. How reproducible is this? Can you debug?
> >
>
> Installed from source - PREFIX = /usr
> deco -v deco-archive-1.5.1-5.fc19.src.rpm deco-1.6.2-5.fc19.src.rpm
> deco-archive-1.5.1.tar.gz
> deco-archive-ape.diff
> deco-archive-shn.diff
> deco-archive-zoo.diff
> deco-archive.spec
> 27 blocks
> deco-archive-1.5.1-5.fc19.src/
> deco-1.6.2.tar.gz
> deco.spec
> 30 blocks
> deco-1.6.2-5.fc19.src/
>
> > Just as a side information; deco is a nice cute tool that is a wrapper
> > around other extractors so you don't need to memorize their syntax. In
> > case of rpm it wraps rpm2cpio.
>
> Yep.
> /usr/share/deco/rpm/extract
> #!/bin/sh
> …
> rpm2cpio "$1" | cpio -idmu${Verbose+v}
> --
>
> /usr/share/deco/rpm/subdirectory: empty!?
> deco-archive.spec is unnecessarily complicated.
> Someone likes the scripting.
By default it installs into /usr/local/share/deco, but the Fedora rpms
override that to /var/lib/deco when running Make.
Nevertheless, building from source isn't a safe fix either, since it only
uses different compiler flags. The crash is due to uninitialized pointers
-> bug 914659
So, don't blame the packaging alone. The C source isn't pretty.
--
Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow) - Linux 3.7.2-204.fc18.x86_64
loadavg: 0.19 0.14 0.09
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
