Re: Fedora 18 and network

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 21.02.2013 17:30, schrieb Tim:
> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 22:38 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> and nobody needs NM for workstations with static IP's
> 
> Yes, and no.  Yes, you don't need it.  But it can still be useful.
> 
> Apart from the most obvious - static addresses being configured by your
> central DHCP server, rather than each machine requiring individual
> configuration. 

and for that do i need NM?
why?

[root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat ifcfg-eth1
DEVICE=eth1
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=dhcp
IPV6INIT=no
NM_CONTROLLED=no
USERCTL=no

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux