Am 31.01.2013 22:02, schrieb Dave Stevens: > Quoting Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> >> >> Am 31.01.2013 20:53, schrieb Jan Litwiński: >>> Dnia 2013-01-31, o godz. 10:25:00 >>> Dave Stevens <geek@xxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): >>> >>>> I tried to install Java in Firefox and after the download I get an >>>> error saying the package is unsigned and installation halts. Have >>>> got the same response with another widely used package. Using the >>>> x86_64 live spin. What to do? >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>> try yum localinstall javapackage >> >> not a smart idea - usually ANY fedora package is signed >> >> missing signatures should be a WARNING SINGAL and not >> ignored like trained monkeys confirm any SSL warning >> in a webbrowser >> > > it isn't a fedora package. I wanted to used a js app in firefox and it needed the plugin then it is not a js app javascript != java > and went looking for one. the download came from Oracle so why not "yum install icedtea-web" which is the java-plugin [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ yum search java web plug-in Geladene Plugins: etckeeper, langpacks, presto, protectbase rhsoft-fedora | 2.9 kB 00:00:00 !!! rhsoft-generic | 2.9 kB 00:00:00 0 packages excluded due to repository protections =================================== N/S Matched: java, web, plug-in ==================================== icedtea-web.x86_64 : Java browser plug-in and Web Start implementation > I have some criticisms of Oracle as a firm but I suppose they can be > trusted to that extent. Anyway I'll try that suggestion when I get back > to that computer trusting in context of a unsigned package? uhm............ each third party repo installs it's GPG key with the release-package
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
