On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 13:02 -0800, Dave Stevens wrote: > Quoting Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > > > > Am 31.01.2013 20:53, schrieb Jan Litwiński: > >> Dnia 2013-01-31, o godz. 10:25:00 > >> Dave Stevens <geek@xxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > >> > >>> I tried to install Java in Firefox and after the download I get an > >>> error saying the package is unsigned and installation halts. Have > >>> got the same response with another widely used package. Using the > >>> x86_64 live spin. What to do? > >>> > >>> Dave > >>> > >> try yum localinstall javapackage > > > > not a smart idea - usually ANY fedora package is signed > > > > missing signatures should be a WARNING SINGAL and not > > ignored like trained monkeys confirm any SSL warning > > in a webbrowser > > > > > > it isn't a fedora package. I wanted to used a js app in firefox and it > needed the plugin and went looking for one. the download came from > Oracle. I have some criticisms of Oracle as a firm but I suppose they > can be trusted to that extent. Anyway I'll try that suggestion when I > get back to that computer. ---- just an fyi... There are many who suggest that even the very latest java update doesn't fix the security issues with the browser plug-in and pretty much everyone and his brother recommend disabling the plug-in right now (Apple did it for you with their last OSX update). It's become a real security nightmare. Don't say you weren't warned and this security issue is even more serious than not having a signed package. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
