On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:55:24 +1100, Philip Rhoades <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Maybe we should try out, say, a nine month cycle and if it doesn't suit - go back to six months? I am conscious though of the human tendency to put off things when there is more time to get them done .
This was done once (intentionally) and it didn't really seem to help much. Most changes can be done smoothly with 6 month releases. We need get better at handling the big changes that take longer. There are a lot of those and there isn't any particular time that would be long enough in all cases. So I'd rather have us figure out efficient ways to do these kind of projects. --
users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
