Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/25/2013 07:41 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: >> 'systemctl status chrony-wait.service' : >> chrony-wait.service - Wait for chrony to synchronize system clock >> Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/chrony-wait.service; disabled) >> Active: inactive (dead) >> CGroup: name=systemd:/system/chrony-wait.service >> >> It's disabled too. And it looks like this run only chronyc, which >> perhaps should not start chronyd.(?) >> >> One more thing: I have in /etc/rc.d/rc.local called ntpdate with >> some external servers (1.cz.pool.ntp.org 2.cz.pool.ntp.org >> 3.cz.pool.ntp.org). But this should not trigger chronyd, yes? > > It actually does, at least on my system, probably because it has Requires=chronyd.service. > > If I have ntpd.service enabled and only chrony-wait.service and reboot my VM it gets started... > > [egreshko@f18x ~]$ systemctl status chronyd.service > chronyd.service - NTP client/server > Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/chronyd.service; disabled) > Active: active (running) since Fri 2013-01-25 21:07:17 CST; 1min 1s ago > Process: 682 ExecStartPost=/usr/libexec/chrony-helper add-dhclient-servers (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) > Process: 647 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/chronyd -u chrony $OPTIONS (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) > Process: 602 ExecStartPre=/usr/libexec/chrony-helper generate-commandkey (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) > Main PID: 676 (chronyd) > CGroup: name=systemd:/system/chronyd.service > └─676 /usr/sbin/chronyd -u chrony > > [egreshko@f18x ~]$ systemctl status chrony-wait.service > chrony-wait.service - Wait for chrony to synchronize system clock > Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/chrony-wait.service; enabled) > Active: active (exited) since Fri 2013-01-25 21:07:47 CST; 1min 8s ago > Process: 684 ExecStart=/usr/bin/chronyc waitsync 60 0.1 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) > > [egreshko@f18x ~]$ systemctl status ntpd.service > ntpd.service - Network Time Service > Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/ntpd.service; enabled) > Active: inactive (dead) > > ntpd didn't get started since it lost the race to get the port. > > Anyway, I'd just go ahead and remove chrony from the system if you're not going to use it. Thus I have not skip over, but creep under? In this case uninstalling chronyd isn't problem, but I can imagine some situation where I want some service being installed, but started only in specific situations. Apparently is time for learning how debug and live with D-bus. Present Fedora advancement fairly shrink me, as there is several things which are unfinished, unreliable and erroneous in certain situations (in particular systemd, pulseaudio, sssd, d-bus, ...). I hope they are cripled only by implementation, not by design; and situation will be with time better... In other case we will have there unstable bastard like windows (now just binary logs are missing;) - I sometimes say oneself, whether at Linux now aren't working designated/canned peoples from windows ;) -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org