On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:49:10 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> But 19 messages after the original post, I´m still answering why I > >> want to obtain such list, instead of saying ´thank you´ to whoever > >> might have provided it. > > > > I thought you got multiple reasonable answers (using yum or repoquery) already. > > It seems, based on his last message, that he doesn't have a working system to implement the suggestions. He said: "I´m stuck in the meantime with a netbook running winblows." > The first messages said "I'm running F17". And when the first helpful replies had come in after 15-18 minutes already, those have not been commented on. That would have been the opportunity to tell that there is no working Fedora installation available. Anyway, parts of the thread are ridiculous. It's obvious that people question the usefulness of sharing the output of "rpm -qa" if that only shows a fraction of what's available in Fedora's Package Collection. -- Fedora release 19 (Rawhide) - Linux 3.8.0-0.rc4.git1.1.fc19.x86_64 loadavg: 0.01 0.08 0.14 -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
