Am 16.01.2013 00:54, schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan: > On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 22:26 +0000, Frank Murphy wrote: >> On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:49:32 -0430 >> Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Not if your using an iso as the source. >>>> As dvd doesn't normally use update just the fedora tree. >>>> hasn't up to F17 at least, when used as an updater. >>> >>> If updating from an ISO, use fedup and then yum update. That's all I >>> meant. If using a network install, fedup should do everything. >>> >> Yum distro-sync is always safer, >> as it allow for nvr errors, >> which yum update doesn't > > Always safer than what? safer than "yum update" was the 3 lines text really too much to read? > With fedup we're talking about a new tool. so what - and we are speaking about AFTER fedup did not run so well > "yum distro-sync" used to be one of the recommended ways to > upgrade Fedora. AFAIK it no longer is. it was NEVER but that does not change the fact that it is best working
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
