On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 19:50 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 15.01.2013 19:45, schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
> > On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 18:03 +0000, Frank Murphy wrote:
> >> On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:30:03 -0430
> >> Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:47 +0000, Frank Murphy wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:45:34 -0500 (EST)
> >>>> JOYCE POLZIN <foxec208@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> sudo yum update
> >>>>> Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
> >>>>> Error: Package tuple ('libpng-compat', 'x86_64', '2', '1.5.10',
> >>>>> '1.fc17') could not be found in rpmdb
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What's up with this??
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> after fedup-cli,
> >>>> did you run yum distro-sync?
> >>>
> >>> Why do you think that would be necessary?
> >>>
> >>> poc
> >>>
> >>
> >> Because op updated from an iso,
> >> which may not have all his F17 installed rpms as F18 on it.
> >> yum distro-sync, should get any not on it.
> >
> > What you mean is "yum update". distro-sync is something else entirely,
> > and AFAIK makes no sense when using fedup as the latter already does all
> > the distro syncing.
>
> no
>
> "yum distro-sync" is EXACTLY for "i want all me installed packages
> in the same version as they are currently in the repos and REALLY
> in the same version, independent if this means update / downgrade
> or whatever"
>
> this is as example the way to go if you have installed packages
> from updates-testing which you want get rid of
>
> "distro-sync" is the only way to get to a 100% defined package set
If that's actually what you want, then OK. But that's not what the OP
asked about.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
