Am 12.01.2013 05:32, schrieb Ian Pilcher: > On 01/11/2013 09:27 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> In the case of F18, they have chosen to move forward with a install >> process which *takes away* functionality. Once should not have to >> revert to figuring out Kickstart to get a disk configuration you >> desire when that option existed in the previous release. > > There's no need to use kickstart. Just use a live CD or the alt+F2 > shell to create the storage configuration you want. Then start the > installation. > > Even when it supports the functionality you want, the new anaconda UI > is never going to be *optimized* for the "hardware-up" way of thinking > that works best for more complex setups, where you want fine-grained > control of what goes where; it is very specifically targeting simpler > workflows. in other words: we will never see a really useable anaconda even the one from F17 is a bad joke because it ALWAYS orders partitions itself instead create them in exactly the order you enter them - WHAT are developers thinking by implement such jokes? it is hardly understandable that it is not possible have /boot, / and /data on 4 disks in exactly this order, no you got the opposite because it gets ordered by partition size WTF - boot is usally the smallest and it was always a good idea to have boot as first partition, but hey why should a developer recall his decisions and test something
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
