> What would be the point? For now, it seems a lot wiser to focus resources > on the standard release of Fedora. If Ubuntu Mobile gets any significant > following, I think it is better to let that carry the flag. Perhaps it's a question of mission: de facto Fedora is a community-oriented proving environment: as software packages acquire increasing stability, they are incorporated into the RHEL and CentOS offerings. Ubuntu's mission seems to be a viable Desktop/Notebook/Netbook alternative to Windows and Macs. Furthermore, RHEL and CentOS are standard-bearing quality offerings to those running production servers. Desktop presence for RHEL and CentOS is not as critical in priority. The challenge, however, is where does an individual's master data (that whole gaggle of PIM, plus media, plus project-related stuff -- code, notes, writing, etc) reside: on a desktop/home LAN; in the cloud; or somewhere else? With the rise of tablets and (increasingly) smartphones, master data centrality blurs, and consequently, the capacity of the OS and its various applications/utilities require that they be able to be hosted on a broader range of machinery (not just desktops and servers, but also tablets and smartphones). Or at least, the data has to be able to be sync'd across this machinery. That's the sort of opinion that is sparked in me given this discussion. > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Timothy Murphy <gayleard@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> Are there any plans for Fedora to follow Ubuntu >> in developing an alternative OS for Android phones? >> >> >> -- [...] > -- > Best, > > Christopher Svanefalk > mob: +46762628251 > skype: csvanefalk Max Pyziur pyz@xxxxxxxxx -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
