On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Roberto Ragusa <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hmmmm? Having an additional intermediate encoding to avoid re-encoding artifacts???
By converting to very high quality MPEG2 you avoid issues with AVI, XVID, H.264 encoding and decoding which a lot of programs handle differently (you can get different results just by using different builds of FFMPEG).
For instance, it´s impossible to do frame-accurate cutting with a lot of AVI cutters, whereas on MPEG2 cuts are frame-perfect. Don´t ask me why, I´m not a codecs writer just an end user of many video cutting tools. And this is based on my personal experience.
MPEG2 is the codec used on broadcast HDTV, and while it´s much less efficient than H.264, it´s less CPU intensive for applications to work with.
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act
Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verdad se convierte en un Acto Revolucionario
- George Orwell
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
