Re: Fedora 17 is behaving very unstable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Luiz Emediato wrote:
Hi there,
I am finding a lot of problems with Fedora 17. I have installed the
DVD distribution
and after a few days I got a kernel panic after an upgrade.
Fortunately after a few days I could re-upgrade the kernel to a newer
version available.
However many system commands do not obey me.
For instance, it does not allow me to choose wallpaper, it is now complaining
about glibc with errors, why? Everything is fresh install. I have also
tried yum reinstall glibc
unsuccessfully.
It does not let me open System Settings now. All very strange.
By the way, default GNOME is horrible. I have successfully changed it
back to Gnome 2.

Aside from your other problems, just how did you do this? You didn't by chance force an install of GNOME2 from an older distribution and revert libraries, did you? If you mean you forced classic mode (sort-of GNOME2), or went to Cinnamon or MATE, please clarify. I saw a release saying GNOME2 was coming back officially, with no details if that means a better classic mode or updated distribution.

However the system seems to be still very unstable. I choose NAMED and
SMBD at Services
but after a reboot systems seems to lose the information so I have to
set it back up manually.

No idea on that, corrupt information could be memory, but "lose changes" is unusual. You aren't booting from a live DVD or anything, are you? Yes, I know that's an unlikely mistake, but I've seen it done...

I used RH9 in the past which was wonderful, very stable. Then RHELv5
very stable too but RH
no longer allows academic subscription. So I stuck with Fedora14 which
worked fine too.
Now I am having all these troubles with v17. I have been using Linux
for over twelve years now
and do consider myself an expert with it as much as other Unix OS's.
Should I wait for the new release 18? Why 17 is so unstable? Would
anyone please advise?

FC17 has been so stable for me that I'm planning to upgrade my FC16 VM hosting servers to it, after months of testing in a non-critical enviroment.

Final thought, if you like real GNOME2 and such, you can get the RHEL6 functionality, with support, from Scientific Linux or CentOS. I have been on SL for a year for many things, because (a) they are the group doing OS support for the LHC (supercollider), and (b) they put a lot of effort into making it easy to have a few custom packages without losing support for the rest.

Thanks
Luiz



--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux