Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:40:03PM +0100, lee wrote: >> > I believe what you say above is wrong. NM respects the ifcfg-* scripts >> > as it should. What the OP is missing is this line: >> >> Then how come that it has emptied out my /etc/resolv.conf though >> resolving information is in the ifcfg-* files? >> > > Maybe what you think is correct resolving information is not actually > correct? The information is correct. It's working fine since networkmanager is disabled. >> > field when using "DHCP for addresses only". I do not remeber the exact >> > lines for the ifcfg scripts but it should be something like this: >> > >> > DNS1=208.67.222.222 >> > DNS2=208.67.220.220 >> > >> > Hope this helps. >> >> Yes there are DNS entries in my ifcfg-* files and networkmanager >> nonetheless empties out resolv.conf. So I take it that it must have >> some configuration of its own --- unless it yields random results under >> some circumstances. >> > > Could it be that there is some conflicting information that is confusing > NM? In anycase, if I find the time to do the tests I'll report back > with my findings. Like I said: I take it that networkmanager must have some configuration of its own --- unless it yields random results under some circumstances. -- Fedora 17 -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
