Marko Vojinovic wrote: > Um, no, NM was an *upgrade* from the network service, since the latter > doesn't handle wireless interfaces in a reasonable way. I don't agree. The network service runs reasonably well with WiFi, though it is not as convenient as NM. > If anything, > the old network service is obsolete, and being used only for special > cases (headless servers and such). By you, possibly. > The vast majority of Fedora users > are running laptops, netbooks, home/office desktops, various mobile > devices, etc., all of which are more convenient to use with NM rather > than the network service. I expect that NM will completely substitute > the network service in the future. I hope not. Occasionally NM does not work, and it is vital (for me, at least) to have an alternative fall-back. Most of the problems with NM arise from the lack of proper documentation. I believe that a lack of documentation not only confuses users. It can also cause confusion in the minds of developers. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
