On 11/04/2012 02:22 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
On 11/4/2012 2:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
As you can see, lsblk displays information about /dev/sdc, and shows
the mount that I did earlier ("mount /dev/sdc1
/mnt/fedora32"), and shows sdc1 as an ext4 filesystem, but shows
nothing about sdc2 other than that it exists. Any
suggestions?
so are you sure that the old setup used LVM at all?
Absolutely. I didn't mention this, but during the last several days
I've tried a lot of different things to be able to look at the files
on /dev/sdc, and there were plenty of confirmations of that.
Furthermore, after the 32-bit installation was done, I often looked at
the output of fdisk, and it ALWAYS showed LVM information -- pretty
much the same information as fdisk now shows about the 64-bit
installation, except for differences in the physical attibutes of the
hard disks.
you said "/dev/sdc1" looks like /boot of the old install
so i bet /dev/sdc2 is the system-disk and if you did not
have a seperated /home what else do you search?
I don't really understand your question. But when I did fdisk on the
32-bit system (when it was up and running; it's disassembled now),
/dev/sdc1 was always listed as /boot. And /dev/sdc2 was always broken
up into the logical volumes /, swap and /home -- just like the new
64-bit installation is.
Alan
For what it's worth, I switched from 32-bit F14 to 64-bit F17. I
retained the same LVM and physical-volume setup from before. I kept my
/home partition (actually a logical volume) and reformatted everything
else. I had no problems at all. Of course, I used Anaconda on a KDE Live
Spin to do the up-conversion. But I'm not sure why I should succeed
where the OP failed.
Temlakos
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
