Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > What really matters is whether the drive itself thinks on its smart test > whether it is likely to be failing not some joke heuristic. And even then, if the 5-year old Google numbers are still valid, you have a 1/3 chance of being surprised. "The Google team found that 36% of the failed drives did not exhibit a single SMART-monitored failure. They concluded that SMART data is almost useless for predicting the failure of a single drive." ref: http://storagemojo.com/2007/02/19/googles-disk-failure-experience/ -wolfgang -- g+: https://plus.google.com/114566345864337108516/about -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org