Javier Perez wrote:
try installing it on a virtual machine with virtualbox
Sort of a brute force way to do it, but in general I agree that this is the best
way to have a separate environment. I don't know how well virtualbox supports
QCOW instances, but it does allow very low overhead VMs to be generated in large
numbers with small overhead.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Marko Vojinovic <vvmarko@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:vvmarko@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> On 03/10/12 19:54, Pasha R wrote:
> > Is it possible to install OOo alongside LO on F17?
As a matter of curiosity, why would anyone want to have both OO and LO
installed simultaneously? Aren't they mostly feature-equivalent and/or
compatible?
Unless you are into research about feature-for-feature comparison between LO
and OO, what's the point of having them both on the same machine?
Best, :-)
Marko
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
--
------------------------------
/\_/\
|O O| pepebuho@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:pepebuho@xxxxxxxxx>
~~~~ Javier Perez
~~~~ While the night runs
~~~~ toward the day...
m m Pepebuho watches
from his high perch.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
