On 2012/09/08 17:44, Chuck Peters wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
there is nothing new and nobody with a brain would say any
system is uncrackable
I thought Oracle called their version Unbreakable Linux and that it
is essentially a clone of RedHat. Can we infer Oracle, or its marketing people,
don't have a brain?
Or perhaps Redhat would have a valuation of 20B+ instead of 11.42B if
Unbreakable Linux didn't exist?
Chuck
If it is as unbreakable as their Java tool I'd just off hand suggest they
were exaggerating just a wee whole potload.
{o.o}
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
